'Click to return to E/M University Home page, EM Coding Education

E/M Coding Forum

  Author   Comment  
Reply with quote  #1 
I am a cardiologist from Connecticut. I thought you may be able to shed some light on my coding dilemma.

I have a question on scoring problem points on MDM as a consultant

If I am a consultant and a PMD sends me a new pt for chest pain which I determine requires NO further work up ( say because stress test ordered by PMD which I review is really negative but someone else thought it was positive) and the patient also has htn and Dm .

Within the MDM components of data, problems and risk ,

Is the max problem points I get in this case 4 or 3?

My coder was saying that I can only get 3 points because htn and Dm are technically new to me and there is a max of 3 points for a new problem with no further work-up with a maximum count of one new problem with no further work up . I said that htn and dm has to count despite the fact that they are not "established " to me and therefore garner 2 more point ( 1 for htn and 1 for dm) for a total of 5 - but since max is 4- I just get 4 qualifying for high complexity.

With this case I did a comprehensive history , comprehensive exam and On MDM
Had 4 data points ; graded it as moderate risk( 2 or more stable problems) ; and I thought (more than 4 problem points (chest pain-3; htn-1; dm-1) I coded it as 99245

My coder said I only got 3 points on the problem category since he would not count the dm and htn for some reason and downgraded it to a 99244.

I have tried to research this online but there is absolutely nothing to explain how a consultant counts problem points on a new patient consult (99245) when the reason for the consult does not require further work up. Do the related co-morbidities garner extra problem points if they are addressed as well just like in a 99215 follow up? I was not aware that there was a difference in counting problems between a new consult and a follow up to the consult?

If a consultant uses the 99205/4 for Medicare Pts - do the rules change, is there a max 3 points for new problem with no further work up no matter how many problems are addressed?

Thank u very much

Posts: 1
Reply with quote  #2 
I would say that since you are seeing the patient primarily for chest pain, that would be the new problem with no work-up for you , worth 3 points. The DM & HTN would be considered comorbidities, contributing towards the Risk, unless these issues were treated or addressed as individual problems on the visit. The documentation would have to support this fact.
Previous Topic | Next Topic

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.

Home   |   Contact Us   |   Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2003 -  EM University. Web Design: Abacus Web Services
Click to return to E/M University Home page, EM Coding Education